(Original post in Lipstick Alley)
SISS is the expert hired by Grant. The VP of Investigations at SISS gave a sworn Declaration in support of the RO filing. SISS stated that they were hired to perform an investigation to locate the author – singular – of threatening and disturbing social media posts. So they were tasked with identifying Parker.
NOTE: Parker had 3 social media posts that will be viewed in a later post.
When, how and why SISS was asked to link Parker to all the other social media accounts is critical because it appears they were asked to do this only after they “located” Parker and saw that she had a criminal history of using aliases.
The only other scenario, given the wording of SISS's sworn Declaration, was that they never entertained the viable concept that there was ever more than one author of these posts. This idea that only one person could find issue with Grant and criticize her online is highly delusional on Grant's part.
In my previous SISS post (see Post #5), I showed that the social media account, Facebook Catharina Monica, made posts while Parker was incarcerated. And that this Facebook account and the Youtube account Catharine1967 have the same photo avatar so they are run by the same person. So, SISS’s statement that these accounts are all Parker’s - was FALSE. The “thousands” of “harassing and threatening posts” were not from Parker.
I also covered that SISS made a false statement to intentionally mislead the judge (perjury) when they stated in their sworn Declaration that the name “Gonsalves” appears in posts at issue. Never does the name Gonsalves appear in any of the exhibits in the RO filing. Any rational person can assume that the posts at issue are included in the original filing.
WHY lie about Gonsalves? BECAUSE the 2015 newspaper story about Parker’s 74 aliases uses both names -- Gonsalves and Parker-- under the photo, and SISS needed a piece of obvious evidence to tie it all together for the Judge.
What’s new in this post is MORE evidence of SISS showing either gross incompetence or lying in their sworn Declaration to the court.
SISS pointed the Judge to Exhibit F to show that they had proof supporting their allegations about Parker/Gonsalves.
According to Exhibit F, on December 15, 2010, the Tehama County Sheriff’s Office executed a search warrant of Parker’s home and vehicle as part of an investigation into an August 2010 online auction real property hustle using E-bay. The report says Parker admitted to conducting illegal activity using another address (Windsor) to facilitate the online fraud. Seized items included documents, debit cards and $5,400 in cash - but no computer or laptop.
Next step in a credible investigation would be to look at Catharine1967’s YouTube account since she is the first social media account named in the filing and also the first social media post exhibit.
On December 15, 2010 Catharine1967 posted a video “Keanu reeves: Sensitive Dragon Heart.”
Also according to Exhibit F, when police returned on December 20, 2010, to serve Parker with a no bail arrest warrant, she was gone. Not surprising since Parker knew she was getting arrested as soon as officers could get the arrest warrant drawn up and signed by a judge because during the police search, she admitted to officers that she had conducted fraudulent online real property transactions.
What should be surprising is that Catharine1967 also posted videos on December 16th and 18th, 2010:
“Keanu Reeves: A Precious Gem” & “Keanu Reeves – Panini Pua Kea” respectively.
So this amounts to Grant labeling Parker as an obsessed fan, who on her way out of town as a fugitive escaping police – TWICE – went to the Windsor address that police knew was used for the illegal activity – just so she could get on a computer to create and upload Keanu fan videos onto her Catharine1967 Youtube account.
As a basic rule of survival, formerly incarcerated people who have a warrant out for their arrest do not return multiple times to a location where police are likely to look for them. They leave the area immediately. Even if they haven’t finished making all of their Keanu videos.
Parker evaded authorities for nearly 5 years and in the same state she was wanted in. That takes street smarts, criminal sophistication and grit that most people do not possess.
It took me less than 15 minutes to read the police report in Exhibit F, see the dates regarding the search warrant and then look at the first social media account and see the videos uploaded at conflicting times.
NOTE: I do not fault the Judge for not seeing the glaring errors and false information in SISS’s sworn Declaration before she issued the TRO. SISS stated they “conducted a comprehensive investigation that included detailed analysis “ of Parker’s criminal record and these social media accounts. Experts are afforded a level of standing in the legal system; judges rely on them.
I do fault SISS, Grant, and her attorneys. They either discussed or looked at SISS’s report/findings and asked them to provide a Declaration explaining their findings (a report was NOT included in the filing); and Grant herself looked at these social media accounts since she compiled exhibits of selected posts that she states harassed her and made her feel threatened and afraid and included them in her sworn Declaration.
No comments:
Post a Comment