Post #15: Grant was given her RO against Parker

 (Original post in Lipstick Alley)

Note: the Minute Orders for November 9th, 10th and 12th are at the end of the post. 

Grant was given her RO against Parker.

I feel comfortable stating that the only way the Judge could have ruled in Grant’s favor is if she ruled that all of the social media accounts, while maybe not being Parker, were controlled and instigated by Parker. That she was the ringleader coordinating all the negative posts against Grant.

I have seen the posts on the named accounts while researching the RO filing - I do not agree with everything that is said - but I will agree that none of these people are ignorant sheep and that each could hold their own against Parker. NO ONE WAS LED TO POST ANY NEGATIVE COMMENTS BY ANYTHING OTHER THAN THEIR CONSCIENCE AND THEIR OWN EXPERIENCE.

I feel very comfortable stating that Parker never physically stalked Grant nor harassed her online and she was never a threat to Grant – it was the online posts by the other social media accounts that Grant feared.

And Parker never had any control over that. 

It was never Parker's sandbox and she was kicked out of it early on.

This RO will not stop the negative online posts against Grant; some of them will be nasty and vulgar and some of them will hit so close to home that Grant will be threatened and afraid of exposure. 

And the sandbox will get bigger.

On that note, I will say that I am very optimistic for the future regarding the story of this RO that Grant has used to manipulate the public narrative about her character, business practices and PR machinations. People will not be hoodwinked forever into believing that delusional or obsessed Keanu Reeves fans run all of these accounts, plus the other social media accounts that are critical of Grant.

I am not delusional. I am not obsessed with Keanu Reeves. Hell, after I read the transcript, I may not even be a fan anymore – because I’m one of those chicks who hates bullshit, abhors hypocrisy and is intolerant of bullies.

And I will continue posting, researching and investigating. 

Because Parker -- and every other vulnerable, marginalized human being in our society like her -- deserves a fair public tribunal.

The transcripts will tell a story, including why super-lawyer Mathew Rosengart a Partner with GreenbergTraurig (Mathew S. Rosengart | Professionals | Greenberg Traurig LLP) would be in Family Court on a RO for Grant. Seems Grant had the privilege and luxury of having two attorneys work on her case for the last 4 months – and both appeared in person each day of the hearing. 

The transcript will also answer questions about why the hearing lasted 3 days and perhaps why the hearing was moved at the last minute from the original judge's courtroom to a brand new judge unfamiliar with any aspects of the filings - for technical reasons to accommodate Grant's lawyers. This technologically superior hearing room was unable to handle even one witness for Parker who was calling in from another country to prove Parker did not run her social media accounts, Catharine1967 Youtube and Catharina Monica Facebook.

Shed light on why the evidence allowed for Parker was mainly online posts (REALLY?! She had to vigorously defend that she was not the 10 other accounts, WITHOUT the benefit of the information from the Facebook subpoena which would have easily proved Parker was not the 10 other accounts? Bit like going to a gun fight with a knife...).

 The transcript may explain WHY the evidence for Grant did not include supporting documentation for her claims, such as the cease and desist letter she claims E. Wood sent to Parker or a sworn Declaration or testimony from any witnesses who attended the public events where she alleged Parker confronted her and stalked her. Nor any testimony or sworn Declarations from any of the business colleagues Grant claims were relentlessly harassed online by Parker. Not one.

But then again, she did not have to provide evidence that what she was alleging was true - it was taken as fact on her word because she had the privilege afforded her by stating Keanu Reeves' name repeatedly in her filing thereby using his reputation to slyly support her claims and his power to gain her a super-lawyer who represents A-list Hollywood stars.  

STILL, facts have a way of showing up when one looks for them. So...

The facts will be known, as in she thought she could get away with it, but truth will out, and I'm sure she'll get caught. (All credit to Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice.)